MCP Prompts
ido4 provides 8 MCP prompts — portable intelligence frameworks that work with any MCP-compatible AI client, not just Claude Code. Each prompt generates methodology-specific reasoning using the active profile’s terminology and principles.
Prompts vs Skills
| Aspect | Skills | Prompts |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | Claude Code only | Any MCP client |
| Invocation | /ido4dev:standup | MCP prompt protocol |
| Features | Memory, file access, hooks | Tool calls only |
| Count | 21 | 8 |
If you’re using Claude Code with the plugin, use skills. If you’re using another MCP client (Cursor, Windsurf, etc.), use prompts.
Available Prompts
standup
Governance-aware briefing. Analyzes container phase, detects blockers with cascade reasoning, identifies temporal patterns from the audit trail, and recommends the highest-impact action.
Arguments: None
plan-{container}
Container composition with principle-aware constraints. The prompt name adapts to your methodology: plan-wave (Hydro), plan-sprint (Scrum), plan-cycle (Shape Up). Framework for dependency analysis, capacity estimation using real throughput data, and validation against the active profile’s principles.
Arguments: containerName (optional)
board
Flow intelligence report. Detects blocked cascades, false statuses, review bottlenecks, container fragmentation, cycle time outliers, and agent coordination issues.
Arguments: containerName (optional)
compliance
Three-part compliance assessment. Quantitative scoring (0-100 with category breakdown), structural audit of governance principles (varies by methodology), and cross-referenced synthesis with actor patterns and temporal trends.
Arguments: None
health
Quick governance dashboard. RED/YELLOW/GREEN across three dimensions (flow, governance, team) with compact metrics and suggested next action.
Arguments: None
retro
Container retrospective. Analyzes real throughput, cycle time trends, measured blocking time, actor patterns, and governance quality. Every recommendation is data-backed. Adapts to methodology: wave retro (Hydro), sprint retro (Scrum), cycle retro (Shape Up).
Arguments: containerName (optional)
review
Container review for stakeholder communication. Deliverable assessment, outcome vs plan analysis, quality metrics, and forward-looking analysis.
Arguments: containerName (optional)
execute-task
Specs-driven task execution guidance. 8-phase framework: specification comprehension, upstream context interpretation, downstream awareness, pattern detection, work execution (methodology-specific principles), escalation protocol, context capture, and completion verification.
Arguments: issueNumber (required)
Methodology-Aware Generation
Prompts aren’t just localized — they use fundamentally different reasoning frameworks per methodology:
- Hydro prompts reason about wave phases, epic integrity, and dependency coherence
- Scrum prompts reason about sprint goals, burndown trajectory, and DoR/DoD per work item type
- Shape Up prompts reason about hill chart positions, appetite consumption, scope hammering, and circuit breaker countdown
The prompt generators read the active methodology profile and produce methodology-native content.
Using Prompts
In any MCP client that supports prompts:
// Request the standup promptGET /prompts/standup
// Request plan-wave with argumentsGET /prompts/plan-wave?containerName=wave-003-advancedThe prompt returns a structured reasoning framework that the AI client uses to compose tool calls and analyze results.